Mike Johnson of The Online Photographer:
It’s always seemed odd to me that cities don’t have photographers. The White House has an official photographer; so do football teams and opera companies; why doesn’t Chicago? Is Phoenix too bland, Atlanta eternal and unchanging, Portland, Maine uninterested in what Portland, Oregon looks like? Cities have official coffee-suppliers, inkwell-fillers, pothole-fixers, numberless keepers of records and documents less worthy than what the place look like when. Any elightened city should have at least one full-time photographer out in it day after day recording the comings and goings, the tearing down and the building up, the passage of life and the comings and goings of the people, the look of the place in the rain and the winter and at night and in times of celebration and crisis and boredom. Any parent does as much for the changing aspect of a single child, as
grows and changes forever. Any city is forever disappearing. Why not notice? [The Online Photographer]
—–
Like this:
Like Loading...
George Barr at Behind the Lens shares a post I can identify with:
Unloved Images
In the previous article I indicated that taking photographs for yourself is entirely justified, and illustrated it with a picture of my bedroom. Except to illustrate the point, I’d never show that image – it’s for me only… – George Barr [Behind The Lens]
(Read/see the article.)
I have a some photographs like this as well – images that I like quite a bit but which don’t seem to connect with other viewers. In fact, I posted one earlier this week – a photograph of a sandstorm in Death Valley. At about the same time I posted several other photos (including this one) in my photo.net gallery. The consensus seemed to be that the colorful landscapes were more appealing.
—–
Like this:
Like Loading...
Solo Rider. Hellyer Park Velodrome. May 19, 2006. © Copyright G Dan Mitchell.
—–
Like this:
Like Loading...
Photographer and visual opportunist. Daily photos since 2005, plus articles, reviews, news, and ideas.
