Category Archives: Ethics

Talent, Tools, or Time?

This is another in a series of posts lifted from something I posted in a photography forum elsewhere. For some reason there has recently been a larger than usual number of discussions about the relative importance of “gear” versus other things when it comes to making good photography. I certainly do not think that equipment is unimportant, but I think that people often focus more on this aspect of photography than necessary, often at the expense of some other things that really have far more potential.

In any case, here is a lightly edited version of what I posted. (Do keep in mind that forum posts do not necessarily represent fully edited and carefully considered work – they are more like a sort of written conversation.) I’ll start with an italicized excerpt of the message to which I was responding. My comment follows that.

All the talent and the world and all the equipment in the world isn’t going to overcome a lack of time to practice… 

Absolutely true. This has always been clear to me from my background in music where a thing called practice was the most important tool for becoming very good and maintaining that state. And it was also very, very clear that no amount of “hardware” (e.g. – “better instrument”) was going to replace that or even make more than the tiniest, insignificant difference without that fundamental thing that results from practice. Continue reading Talent, Tools, or Time?

Locations: How Much Info is Too Much Info?

A forum discussion in which I recently participated (it involved an ethical question related to providing GPS coordinates for a photography destination) has me thinking today about how much information to reveal about photography subjects and locations and the factors that we might want to consider as we share such things. With that in mind, here is a link to something I posted on this topic after a conversation with a photographer friend who is a retired Yosemite ranger.

Photo Contests and Protecting Your Rights

The Photo Attorney web site has a post on the subject of “rights grabs” associated with photography contests. (See “Photo Contests Here and Abroad Grab Rights“) This is a subject that has concerned me for some time, and about which I and many others have written from time to time.

The basic problem is this. In many of these contests (in most of them from what I’ve seen) the photographer who submits a photograph to the contest surrenders considerable rights to his/her work . Note that the loss of rights typically occurs whether or not the photographer’s work ‘wins’ the contest! In quite a few cases the language in the contest agreement gives full, unlimited rights for any imaginable use of the photographers submitted work without any compensation, control, or (in quite a few cases) credit to the company sponsoring the contest, the marketing firm(s) supervising the contest, and even to other businesses that they cooperate with.

This applies to every photograph submitted by every participating photographer – not just the winners. (Even if these onerous terms only applied to “winners,” one would wonder who actually “wins” in a situation where a whole team of corporate interests acquire free rights to the “winning” photographer’s work.)

No, I’m not making this up.

It is not without reason that many refer to these things as “intellectual property rights grabs” rather than as photography contests.

This is not to say that there are no legitimate photography contests. It seems reasonable that the work of contest winners would be displayed in some limited (as to time, medium, and so forth) manner directly associated with the contest itself – that would be mutually beneficial to the winning contestants and to those putting on the contest. But photographers who believe that their work has value should be very cautious about such contests, and they should read contest terms very carefully before submitting their work.


G Dan Mitchell is a California photographer and visual opportunist. His book, “California’s Fall Color: A Photographer’s Guide to Autumn in the Sierra” (Heyday Books) is available directly from him.

G Dan Mitchell: Blog | Bluesky | Mastodon | Substack Notes | Flickr | Email


All media © Copyright G Dan Mitchell and others as indicated. Any use requires advance permission from G Dan Mitchell.

Sierra Club Photo Contest – Photographers Beware!

I’ve been a card carrying member of the Sierra Club since I was in college and I generally am a strong supporter of the causes they promote. I’ve always appreciated the Club’s use of photography to promote environmental and wilderness protection issues. I recently received an email inviting me to submit photographs for a contest they are sponsoring, and I thought I’d submit a few of my photographs.

As I generally do these days, I decided to read the contest rules – which include the following:

All entants agree that entry in the contest and/or acceptance of the grand-prize package constitutes permission for Sierra Club, its affiliates, subsidiaries, successors assigns, advertising and promotional agencies, to use entant’s entry materials, including the photograph(s) entered in the Contest (the Photograph(s)), for editorial, advertising and publicity purposes without further compensation, with or without entrant’s name, and with or without modification, in any medium now known or hereafter created throughout the world to the extent permitted by applicable law. Each entrant and winner agrees and acknowledges that to the best of his or her knowledge, Sierra Club’s use of the Photograph(s) will not violate the rights of any other person or organization and Sierra Club will not incur liability for payment to any other person or organization. Each entrant and winner agrees to indemnify and release Sierra Club and its officers, directors, employees, agents and advertising and promotional agencies for and from any and all claims associated with the use of any submitted or winning Photograph, including without limitation any rights of publicity, right of privacy, defamation, trademark or copyright claims.

(Emphasis added for clarity)

Unbelievable! By merely entering a photograph in their contest (and, by the way, I don’t see anything to prohibit someone else from entering your photograph without your knowledge) you have just given the Sierra club and just about every entity they ever do business with or collaborate with in any way an unlimited blanket license to use your photograph for any purpose they see fit for all eternity in any medium (including those not invented yet – really) with no credit to you for your work and no payment for the use. Oh, but it gets worse. Despite giving away your rights to your intellectual property, the Sierra Club will let you retain all liability for the use of the photograph.

I’m trying to refrain from using the language that best describes these “terms” – so I’ll just say you would be a fool to enter this contest.

Remember that I’m a Sierra Club member who supports the goals of the group and the contest and a photographer who wanted to enter the contest. When I contacted the contest coordinator the response was basically “don’t annoy us.”

Afterthought: I suppose you could point to the typo in the first line of the material quoted above (see “entants”) and point out that the conditions don’t apply to you since you are an entrant rather than an entant. But you’d still be in big trouble if your photo won…


G Dan Mitchell is a California photographer and visual opportunist. His book, “California’s Fall Color: A Photographer’s Guide to Autumn in the Sierra” (Heyday Books) is available directly from him.

G Dan Mitchell: Blog | Bluesky | Mastodon | Substack Notes | Flickr | Email


All media © Copyright G Dan Mitchell and others as indicated. Any use requires advance permission from G Dan Mitchell.