Canon 50D Announced: Competition is a Good Thing

News of Canon’s announcement of the new EOS 5D cropped sensor mid-range DSLR is all over the web today – well, at least all over the photographic portion of the web. The new body updates the X0D line from the recent 40D, primarily by updating the 1.6x cropped sensor to 15 megapixels. According to Canon this was done while increasing the performance at high ISOs, keeping the burst rate almost the same as that of the 40D, and maintaining image quality by the use of “gapless microlenses” that can capture more light than would have been the case with older designs. There are other feature updates as well, and it looks like the price will be roughly but not precisely in the same ballpark as that of the 50D… at least once the prices drop a few months after the introduction of the new camera.

What does this mean for the DSLR buyer? The answer is, “It depends.”

If I were (I’m not) already in the market for a cropped sensor camera body of this type I would almost certainly select this body over the 40D. On the other hand, price-sensitive buyers will probably now be able to pick up the excellent 40D for a lot less than they would spend on the 50D. While there can be advantages in using a sensor with “more megapixels,” the difference in these terms is actually fairly slight. You would see absolutely no difference in the image quality in jpg images posted online in typical sizes, and you would see no difference in letter size prints either. It sounds like there is no disadvantage (aside from the initial higher price) in getting the 50D, but the advantages over the 40D are going to be incremental rather than “night and day.”

And, of course, there is little reason for most folks to “upgrade” from a 40D to a 50D. Inevitably there will be a few folks who “have to have the best” who will sell of their fine 40D so that they can get a 50D… only to discover that their photographs don’t change as a result. (Smart used camera shoppers will seek out these sellers and get good deals on used 40D bodies!)

But in my view the 50D itself is not the real story. The more interesting development is that Canon is now seeing some real competition in the DSLR market and we may be starting to see Canon’s response. During the past year Nikon basically caught up with Canon in virtually all parts of this market (except – so far – the niche occupied by the 1DsMKIII) and arguably surpassed Canon in a few areas. And Sony is coming on strong with new bodies including an upcoming full-frame model. During the time when Canon had the clear lead in technology developments (higher MP cropped sensor bodies and essentially the only full frame bodies) it sometimes appeared that Canon was taking a “go slow” approach to improving and updating their cameras and their lenses. But with renewed competition from Nikon and the prospect of serious competition from Sony, I think that buyers/owners of all DSLR brands are going to see some real benefits in terms of feature developments and pricing.

I have some hunches about where things may lead in the next year or two. I think we are going to see full-frame cameras at lower price points before long. Nikon threw down the gauntlet here with their introduction of the D700, with almost all of the features of their D3 but at a much lower price. With that on the table I think Canon is going to have to do something special to follow up on the 5D. I also continue to think that someone – perhaps Canon, though it could be Sony, too – will eventually introduce a full-frame body at a price point that is competitive with the X0D bodies and the Nikon D300. As a background to all of this, I think that pricing will become somewhat more competitive, especially if the rumors about Sony introducing their full-frame body at a much lower price turn out to be true. In addition, I give some credence to rumors that Canon may update some of their lenses so that they will better take advantage of much higher photosite density sensors that will be introduced before long. Finally, buyers of introductory-level DSLRs such as Canon’s Rebel line are starting to see more of the high end features in their cameras – frankly, these are very competent little cameras that provide more than enough photographic power and quality for most folks in the market for a first DSLR.

(Update: And only hours later Nikon announced their new D90 – more or less in the same market segment but with some different features. Its ability to do video is compelling – especially given that it can record video using the varying focal lengths and excellent optical quality of DSLR lenses – and this feature is likely to end up on most DSLRs before too much longer. The D9- looks like a fine camera and a worthy competitor to the 50D.)

G Dan Mitchell Photography

About | Flickr | Twitter | Facebook | Google+ | 500px.com | LinkedIn | Email

Text, photographs, and other media are © Copyright G Dan Mitchell (or others when indicated) and are not in the public domain and may not be used on websites, blogs, or in other media without advance permission from G Dan Mitchell.

(Basic EXIF data is available by “mousing over” large images in blog posts. Leave a comment if you want to know more.)

4 thoughts on “Canon 50D Announced: Competition is a Good Thing”

  1. Yes, that “gapless microlens” feature is something that should address the concerns of those who are/were concerned that no increases in photosite density would be possible without impaired noise handling. And, as you suggest, if Canon can do a 15MP crop sensor version of this technology, they should also be able to do a higher photosite version on full frame at a price that could well be in line with that of the 5D line.

    I’ve been thinking that the “5DII” would likely be a 16MP camera, but it will be interesting to see what happens now. One legacy that Canon has developed over the past decade or so is leadership in the full-frame market segment. With Sony and Nikon coming on strong (both are rumored to introduce 20MP-25MP bodies soon), Canon might be interested in doing something special to maintain their reputation as the leader in this area.

    If so, this also makes one wonder where the 1D and 1Ds series might be going in the not-too-distant future, and whether or not there is anything to the rumors of a “new body” that is not exactly in any of these categories.

    Ah, rumors. Great fun! ;-)

    Dan

  2. Very well put… my thoughts exactly.

    Seems that some of the technologies presented (borderless pixels being the most prominent IMO) will make a substantial difference on the next iteration of the 5D series. Suddenly the idea of 20mp with usable 3200 ISO+ doesn’t seem so far off. For f2.8 event shooters like myself, that’s a substantially good reason to upgrade.

    Take care,

    Jonny

  3. Thanks for writing.

    Sounds like we’re pretty much on the same page, in more than one way.

    I agree with you about the idea that every other generation is about the right upgrade frequency for many photographers. There are exceptions, but if you look at most of the next version upgrades you find that the improvements are good and useful but less than earth-shattering in scope. If I shot a 20D I’d take a very serious look at the 5D if I felt that my current camera wasn’t cutting it. If I shot a 40D I’d be hard pressed to justify the upgrade unless I had specific printing issues that I could unequivocally trace to the 10MP sensor. However, a) that’s not likely, and b) a move to full frame would probably make more sense in that case.

    It will be very interesting to see what comes out as the next generation after the 5D. The 5D is a fine camera and I’m very happy with the performance of mine – but it has been something like three years that it has been out now. If Canon had updated it in the past year, I imagine that the changes would likely have been fairly minor – perhaps of the same magnitude as those between the 30D and the 40D. But given the new competition it seems that some of the rumors of something more substantial could turn out to be real.

    Dan

  4. While i’m not about to trade in my 40D… It’s exciting to see both Canon and Nikon push each other technologically. Every new generation seems to offer something new that actually makes a signifcant difference in image quality or usability… making upgrading every 2 generations often very worthwhile

    Meanwhile… i’m still waiting for the 5D2

Join the discussion — leave a comment or question. (Comments are moderated and may not appear immediately.)

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.