Category Archives: Tests

Testing Assumptions

As I wander around the net and poke my nose into various photography forums I often read questions about how this, that, or the other thing works. I also read a lot of wild speculation and theorizing about various issues that may (or may not) be relevant to the quality of ones photographs. One thing that strikes me about many of these questions is that the photographer could easily determine the answer for him/herself. Now, I’m not one to discourage people from asking questions – often it is a lot more efficient to just get the answer than to test. But in other cases, there is a certain subjective element to the answer, and one cannot expect to get a single, objective and definitive answer from an online forum. In these cases some simple testing can be the best approach.

A day or two ago I saw (yet another) post asking what is the slowest shutter speed that I can hand hold? We’ve all heard the old rule of thumb: You can hand hold at a shutter speed of one over the focal length, or 1/50 second with a 50mm lens. (As an aside, to the extent that this formula provides some guidance for 35mm or full frame SLRs, it needs to be adjusted upwards by the crop factor for cropped sensor cameras. Just thought you’d want to know… ;-)

The actual answer to the minimum shutter speed question is a bit more complicated. Not everyone is equally steady with the camera. Technique also makes a difference, as do the circumstances of the shot. The subject can make a difference as well: while it is likely that any blur from camera motion will be unacceptable in a landscape, some motion blur in the subject can enhance the effect of, for example, certain sports photographs. The size of the final image is relevant: blur that is invisible in a 600 pixel online jpeg may be unacceptable in a 12″ x 18″ print. And so forth…

So, what to do? Test.

Put a lens on your camera and make a series of test photographs. For this particular test I’d recommend several exposures at each shutter speed – there not a simple binary division between speeds that work and shutter speeds that don’t. Instead, there will be a range at which your success rate becomes too low, and shooting perhaps 3-5 frames at each shutter speed helps reveal this. Repeat at different focal lengths. When you inspect the resulting photographs – keeping in mind how they might actually be used – you’ll learn a ton about how to use the variable of shutter speed in your photography. In fact, your knowledge will go way beyond the simple “rule of thumb.”

To carry on with the main subject, shutter speed is certainly not the only thing you can test. There are a ton of photography myths that seem to live on unchallenged. Some deserve to be challenged, and your own testing is a good way to determine whether they are useful rules or nonsense or something in between. I often hear that statements about aperture and image quality such as the following: “my lens is sharp across the frame wide open,” “f/8 is the sharpest aperture”, “you can’t shoot smaller than f/11 because you’ll get diffraction blur,” or “that lens is no good because it vignettes wide open.” Every one of these statements is subject to simple testing, and in each case the tester could learn something surprising and useful.

Finally, a caution. It is possible to let yourself become more of an obsessive gear nut than a photographer. I’m certainly not recommending that. The point of these exercises is simply to understand your tools better so that you can use them more effectively and creatively… to make photographs.


G Dan Mitchell is a California photographer and visual opportunist. His book, “California’s Fall Color: A Photographer’s Guide to Autumn in the Sierra” (Heyday Books) is available directly from him.

G Dan Mitchell: Blog | Bluesky | Mastodon | Substack Notes | Flickr | Email


All media © Copyright G Dan Mitchell and others as indicated. Any use requires advance permission from G Dan Mitchell.

Shooting Active Subjects With a Long Lens

Although I’m not an expert on the subjects of sports photography or bird photography (or “BIF,” as aficionados write) using really long lenses, I have had some opportunities to pick up some skills in these areas recently. Since one of my photography contacts recently wrote and asked for some advice about using a longer lens to photograph birds, I thought I’d share a bit of what I’ve found to work for me.

First, if I were specializing in these types of photography I would likely use different equipment than what I currently have. For example, I know that many folks find the big prime telephotos to be ideal for their work and some prefer the very large, heavy, and expensive large aperture versions. Great lenses for sure, but not exactly suitable for what I do – so my long lens is a Canon EF 100-400 f/4.5-5.6 L IS. I shoot a full frame Canon 5D. This is a great camera for urban and wild landscapes and other types of photography that I tend to do, but it would not typically be regarded as ideal for the type of shooting I’m writing about today. Something with a faster burst mode might be better for those focusing on this type of shooting, and in many cases the advantages of full-frame might be outweighed by other factors.

That said, what have I learned so far? In no particular order, a list:

  • Hit rates can be quite low. If you are the kind of photographer who likes to think a lot about The Shot before pressing the button, or who gets frustrated when not every shot is good – get over it. You are going to take a lot of bad photographs, but you’ll eventually start to get better and to get some good ones.
  • The Sprint, Santa Rosa - 2008 Amgen Tour of California
    Tracking moving subjects takes practice. A lot of practice. In many ways it is like learning a sport – you need to do the thing many times, fail many times, begin to succeed, and learn from the process. The first few times I tried panning with a pack of bicycle racers my success rate was terribly low – lots of shots of rear wheels, tilted way out of horizontal and so forth. Eventually I began to smooth out the panning process, reserve a part of my attention for keeping the camera more or less level. Eventually I had more success when I focused up putting the center of the subject in a certain part of the frame, rather than just aiming and hoping.
  • Turning off all focus points except the center AF point can help. I find this to be especially true with birds in flight. Unless the background is clear sky the camera will often AF on everything but the bird. With only one AF point active the trick becomes getting it on the moving bird, but if you can do this you’ll focus on the right subject.
  • 20080217_5981GDanMitchell.jpg
    Sometimes pre-focusing can be your friend. In particular with sports that follow a set path – like bicycle racing time trials – you may have more success by applying your careful analytical skills to setting up a shot. Find a good location, pre-focus on a place where the rider will likely be and turn off AF, begin tracking the rider before arrival at the pre-focus spot, and fire away. This can work with birds in flight, but in practice I find it much less reliable there since the darn birds tend to fly all over the place. However, you can sometimes determine that birds are following a particular route and position yourself accordingly. Along the California coast the birds often seem to follow particular routes relative to tops of cliffs or rocks that extend into the water. Spend a few minute studying this and you may locate invisible “sky trails” that they follow.
  • Your camera’s “servo” mode may help in some cases, but it isn’t necessarily a panacea with subjects that really move fast. Sorry, you’ll have to figure this one out on your own. :-)
  • Burst mode can be your friend. When subjects move very fast – both in terms of their motion through space and in terms of they own motion of legs, wings, etc. – it can be important to get multiple images. Even the relatively leisurely burst rate of my 5D is very useful. But you still need to think a lot about timing the shots – just holding the shutter down without thinking will result in a very low hit rate. Sometimes it is still better to take just a single well-timed frame. I’ll often put the camera in burst mode but still sometimes only shoot a single frame.
  • The longest focal length is not always best. In fact, I don’t actually shoot my 100-400mm lens at 400mm all that often. In other cases I’ll use the 70-200 instead.

A few other perspectives I’ve picked up from using the longer lens and from shooting these wildlife and sports subjects:

  • Not all sports and wildlife shots require long lenses. In fact, some of the most interesting shots in both categories can take the opposite approach and use wide lenses.
  • Fisherman, Winter Surf (2)
    I’ve also learned more about how very long lenses can be great for certain types of landscape shots. Although I’ve always tended to think in ultra-wide, wide, normal, or shot tele terms when I do landscape, the first time out with the long lens I got a series of landscape shots that I could simply not have taken with the shorter lenses.
  • Developing the high speed thinking that you must do when you photograph highly active subjects can improve your photographic work in other areas. If you are comfortable framing a composition given a few minutes to think about it, trying to apply your composition skills to an image in which everything is in flux will really sharpen your “seeing” skills.
  • Working outside of your subject comfort zone – e.g. sports for the landscape shooter – has a bunch of positive effects. Not the least of these is understanding how these other subjects can be handled in a way that is every bit as aesthetically interesting as the subjects you may be comfortable with.

Corner Sharpness of the Canon 17-40mm f/4 L Lens on Full Frame

Since the question of how the Canon EF 17-40 f/4 L performs across the frame for landscape photography comes up periodically, I have posted an older test photo I made last year (2007) – updated here to include a comparison corner and center sharpness.

Canon5D17_40f16CornerVsCenter.jpg

Technical data: Canon 5D. Canon EF 17-40mm f/4 L lens. Focal length: 17mm. Aperture: f/16. Shutter speed: 1/60 second. Shot on the tripod with MLU and remote release. If the full image were reproduced at this resolution the print would be about five feet wide. (Not that I’d do that – it is a really boring photograph! :-) In a more typical size print the corners would like very good, indeed.

A 100% crop would not be expected to be “razor sharp” – and we see typical results here. It is impressive to see how well the corner image quality holds up – despite the fact that grass is one of the most challenging subjects for a digital sensor and the fact that this part of the scene was much closer to the camera than the focus point in the center of the scene – i.e. the corner section showing the grass is only a few feet from the camera, and the camera is focused hundreds of feet away on the objects in the center of the frame. (On that subject, I’m convinced that a good number of the reports of “poor corner performance” in ultra wide lenses are actually due to the subjects in the corner being much closer to the camera position than the subjects in the center of the frame, especially when the “tests” are done by shooting actual landscape subjects.)

BOTTOM LINE: What does this tell us, how do we view this in the context of reports of soft corners on the EF 17-40mm f/4 lens, and what does this mean for anyone trying to choose a wide (or ultra-wide in the case of full-frame cameras) Canon zoom lens?

While this lens is soft in the corners when shot wide open, the lens is not particularly soft in the corners when stopped down. If your primary use for such a lens is, for example, shooting very low light handheld wide angle photographs the 17-40 is perhaps not your best choice. (The EF 16-35mm f/2.8 on full frame or the EFS 17-55mm f/2.8 IS on a cropped sensor body could be more appropriate zooms.) On the other hand, if you are primarily interested in subjects that are usually shot at smaller apertures (urban/wild landscapes, architecture, etc.) then the 17-40 can be an outstanding lens – though this is more true on a full frame body than on a crop body, given that you are unlikely to use the smaller apertures on a crop sensor body given the diffraction blur issues there. So, to state it very succinctly…

… the Canon EF 17-40mm f/4 lens is an excellent lens for shooting deep DOF small-aperture photography on a full-frame camera. (It is OK but not necessarily ideal for use with cropped sensor bodies, where I would prefer the EFS 17-55mm f/2.8 IS.)

G Dan Mitchell is a California photographer whose subjects include the Pacific coast, redwood forests, central California oak/grasslands, the Sierra Nevada, California deserts, urban landscapes, night photography, and more.
Blog | About | Flickr | Twitter | Facebook | Google+ | 500px.com | LinkedIn | Email

Text, photographs, and other media are © Copyright G Dan Mitchell (or others when indicated) and are not in the public domain and may not be used on websites, blogs, or in other media without advance permission from G Dan Mitchell.