Since the question comes up frequently and because it is Small Business Saturday, let me answer the question: “Do you sell prints of your photographs?”
Yes, I do. Virtually every photograph that appears at this web site is available as a print. I’ve been told they make nice gifts! :-) There is more information about print sales (and licensing) at the Sales page on this web site. Please contact me if you have additional questions or would like to order a print for the holidays. Thanks!
Star trails above the Manifold, Zabriskie Point, Death Valley National Park, California.
One of my goals on my late-March trip to Death Valley was to do some night photography, in particular to take advantage of the nearly full moon near the end of my visit. Some of my plans did not quite work out – for example, on the night when I intended to do night photography of the moving rocks at the Racetrack Playa it was cloudy all night! However, on the final night of my visit the weather gods cooperated and I was able to make a few exposures from Zabriskie Point as the moon rose. As if to partially make up for messing up the intended Racetrack shots, the “cloud gods” were kind enough to provide me with a few high thin clouds at Zabriskie. This was one of those wonderful occasions when things actually did go as planned!
Anticipating the full moon at Zabriskie, I made a point of camping in the vicinity of Furnace Creek at the Texas Springs campground. (I expect that my habits mystified a few nearby campers. I drove in at about 2:00 p.m., grabbed a site and “marked” it by leaving a chair and a tarp, and almost immediately left – not returning until nearly 10:00 p.m. Then I was up and gone well before sunrise.) In any case, I headed down to the Badwater area in the late afternoon to photograph sunset light on the salt flats and evening clouds – following an impromptu “dinner” at the back of my car at the Badwater parking lot. It was getting fairly dark by the time I finished up at Badwater, so I headed straight up to Zabriskie. By the time I arrived the moon was just coming up over the mountain range to the east, with its light at times filtering through high clouds. During the hour I was there I made three exposures. With exposure times in the 8 to 12 minute range and followed by “dark frame exposures” of equal length, this was a slow and quiet process.
This photograph is not in the public domain and may not be used on websites, blogs, or in other media without advance permission from G Dan Mitchell.
From time to time people ask what techniques I use to create the simple frames for versions of my photographs that I post online. A while ago I wrote about this: Creating Frames for Online Photos: My Method. The explanation involves the use of Photoshop CS3, but the technique is essentially the same in the current version of the program.
You can read the details at the link above, but the process is basically fairly straightforward. I use Image –> Canvas size to add a series of borders to the original image: a one-pixel gray border immediately around it, a larger white border beyond that with a bit more width at the bottom, and finally a one-pixel black border at the outer edge. I turn this into an action that I can apply by selecting it and clicking a button to run it.
The approach to creating the text incorporated into the web images is similar, though it requires a bit of tweaking with each photograph. Essentially, I create three text layers: one for the large type at the bottom, one for the small embedded copyright notice, and a slightly larger “watermark” that will go over the image itself. The action I recorded creates the three layers and inserts the boilerplate text, but I always have to do a bit of alignment manually, and I may also have to make some decisions about opacity and so on depending upon the characteristics of the individual image. Still, it takes less than a minute to do the whole thing even in the wost cases.
Why apply a border, “branding” text, and copyright to the photographs?
If people like your photograph, it makes sense to make it easy for them to find you – so I include the easily readable text with my name and web site URL. No matter where the unaltered file ends up, viewers will be able to find the source.
The use of consistent presentation helps to establish the photographer’s “brand.” This is true even when the image is displayed in ways that are out of your control, including search engine results.
Inclusion of the copyright information is a formality to remind viewers that use of my photographs requires advance permission.
Although the inclusion of a watermark cannot stop a dedicated image thief, I think it reduces the likelihood of misappropriation – and that is probably about all that one can really hope for on the basis of a watermark. It may tweak the conscience of the typical user, who may perhaps simply not have thought about the issues of legal usage, and it may encourage others to look for a different image that won’t expose their illegal use and/or require them to take the intentional step of trying to remove the text to cover up the source.
I also addressed these issues in a separate post at this blog.
(Occasionally a person interested in purchasing a print or licensing a photograph for some other use wonders if the embedded watermarks, copyright information, and branded borders are part of the original images. No. When you purchase a print there is nothing on the paper but the photograph itself and my signature. Photos licensed for other uses – books, magazines, web site, etc – are normally provided without added text.)
Some months ago I became aware of the terms of many of the photo contests on the web and in magazines – and since that time I haven’t seen more than a couple that I would even consider entering given their effect on the value of my work. (The Photo Attorney writes about one today and has written about others in the past.)
If you enter a contest it seems reasonable to assume that the company running the contest would acquire some limited licensing rights to use the winning photograph in ways logically connected to the contest and to their company in return for selecting the photograph and providing the winner some valuable prizes and publicity. For example, if a magazine has a photography contest it seems reasonable to expect that they should be able to publish the photograph in the magazine in an article announcing the winners, or perhaps even use it as a cover illustration with full credit to the photographer and with a clear connection to the contest. There should be time limits and the license should not extend much beyond those circumstances, though the terms may well spell out the ways in which the company might negotiate additional uses in the future.
However, that is not how most of these contests work. When you read the contest terms you will almost always discover some very serious issues:
Rather than limiting their license as to time and to types of usage logically related to the contest, most terms that I have seen acquire extensive, virtually unlimited rights to the photographer’s work. Most are written so broadly as to acquire the right to do essentially anything with the photograph, for any period of time, in any medium – and completely without compensation to the photographer and in most cases without credit to the phtographer.
In most cases the license extends not only to the entity conducting the contest but to a host of business partners and others that appears to be virtually unlimited. For example, the way many contest terms are written it would be entirely legal for the printing company that prints the magazine to use the entrant’s photograph in unrelated publications with entirely different clients – again without any compensation or even credit to the photographer.
Most onerous of all, in virtually even contest I’ve seen these terms are not limited to the contest winners. Instead, the conditions apply to every contest entry! That’s right – if you enter the contest but do not win you still will have provided a free, eternal, unlimited license to the company running the contest and to a wide range of others who might do business with those running the contest. Consider that those operating the contests acquire unlimited usage rights to hundreds or thousands of photographs submitted for consideration. This is why the term intellectual property rights grab is often used to describe the contests.
When I’ve contacted entities running contest with such terms I have gotten a variety of responses. The response that I consider to be most disingenuous – and downright dangerous – goes something like this: “Yes, that’s what the legal department made us do, but we would never treat a contest entrant that way. You can trust us.” At this point the red flag should go up and alarm bells should ring. If they really don’t intend to grab these rights, why write contest terms that allow them to do so? Why not write the contest rules in such a way that they reflect their actual intent?
Read the contest terms very carefully before you enter any photography contest. While the lure of a prize and a bit of recognition may entice you, keep in mind that few actually win, that the judging can be quite arbitrary, and whether or not you win you will have given away rights to your work.
Photographer and visual opportunist. Daily photos since 2005, plus articles, reviews, news, and ideas.
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.